Dogmatism...
It is very true that people don't care what you know until they know that you care.
But our [Western, white, postmodern] culture seems especially queasy about any kind of certainty or any narrow views of truth. So much so that I find it suspect that it is merely historical bad behavior by confessing Christians that has fueled all this, as some very apologetic believers seem to think. I think such aversion is rooted in human nature.
So this aversion to certainty and truth is nothing new. Perhaps the extent of it is, but the idea is quite old. Here is evidence of the problem and what I think is a good addressing of it from over a century ago:
But our [Western, white, postmodern] culture seems especially queasy about any kind of certainty or any narrow views of truth. So much so that I find it suspect that it is merely historical bad behavior by confessing Christians that has fueled all this, as some very apologetic believers seem to think. I think such aversion is rooted in human nature.
So this aversion to certainty and truth is nothing new. Perhaps the extent of it is, but the idea is quite old. Here is evidence of the problem and what I think is a good addressing of it from over a century ago:
"[Dislike of dogma]
is an epidemic which is just now doing great harm, and specially among young people… It produces what I must venture to call… a
“jelly-fish” Christianity in the land: that is, a Christianity without bone, or
muscle, or power. A jelly-fish… is a pretty and graceful object when it floats
in the sea, contracting and expanding like a little, delicate, transparent
umbrella. Yet the same jelly-fish, when cast on the shore, is a mere helpless
lump, without capacity for movement, self-defense, or self-preservation.
Alas! It is a vivid
type of much of the religion of this day, of which the leading principle is,
“No dogma, no distinct tenets, no positive doctrine.” We have hundreds of
“jelly-fish” clergymen, who seem not to have a single bone in their body of
divinity. They have not definite opinions; they belong to no school or party;
they are so afraid of “extreme views” that they have no views at all. We have
thousands of “jelly-fish” sermons preached every year, sermons without an edge,
or a point, or a corner, smooth as billiard balls, awakening no sinner, and
edifying no saint.
We have Legions of
“jelly-fish” young men annually turned out from our Universities, armed with a
few scraps of second-hand philosophy, who think it a mark of cleverness and
intellect to have no decided opinions about anything in religion, and to be
utterly unable to make up their minds as to what is Christian truth. They live
apparently in a state of suspense, like Mohamet’s fabled coffin, hanging
between heaven and earth… and last, and worst of all, we have myriads of
“jelly-fish” worshippers - respectable Church-going people, who have no distinct
and definite views about any point in theology. They cannot discern things that
differ, any more than color-blind people can distinguish colors. They think
everybody is right and nobody wrong, everything is true and nothing is false,
all sermons are good and none are bad, every clergyman is sound and no
clergyman is unsound. They are “tossed to and fro, like children, by every wind
of doctrine”; often carried away by any new excitement and sensational
movement; ever ready for new things, because they have no firm grasp on the
old; and utterly unable to “render a reason of the hope that is in them.”
…Never was it so important for laymen to hold systematic views of truth, and
for ordained ministers to “enunciate dogma” very clearly and distinctly in
their teaching."
J.C. Ryle (1816-1900), an evangelical Anglican
clergyman and first Bishop of Liverpool.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home